This is a book that some of the biggest names in the country
have rated very highly; and yet, it is also a book that I just could not
connect to, for specific reasons outlined in the review. Cutting The Gordian Knot is a book penned by – and reviewed by –
some of the best talent in our country; that is true. It is also a book with
zero ground connect, a book of dreams, a book of tall ideas – some practical,
fewer practicable, and some not so practical. Practical implies useful, capable
of being put into effect; while practicable means feasible as well as usable.
That sums up the book. Practical – for sure.
Practicable? No way. Comprehensive? No. It misses several vital aspects.
THE GORDIAN
KNOT
The Gordian
Knot means a difficult problem; the book is aptly named – it looks at some of
the most difficult problems confronting our nation, our people at the current
point in time. It looks at the state of Education, Employment, Employability,
Entreneurship, Upscaling, Human Capital etc, for the Urban as well as the Farm
/ Rural Sector. This is at the best of times, a tall task; the scope attempted
is awesome, mind-numbing – and the ideas it contains do attempt to do justice
to this. Credit where credit is due – the authors and the contributors have to
be credited with actually trying to put together a set of ideas that are
actually practical. Yet, my rating stands at 1 star; poor. To understand, read
the analysis…
THE ANALYSIS
As I stated in
the opening, practical and practicable are two entirely different things in
life. What is practical may not be practicable; it might actually be merely a
sensible desire, when you take the ground reality into consideration. That is
the biggest problem, lack of an appreciation for the ground reality. Maybe, at
some point in the future, we will realize these dreams; that is certainly possible,
doable, and practicable. But not yet, not now.
Second, the
overt, clear and defined emphasis on the Technology aspect, online delivery platforms,
etc for nearly all problems {as far as I recall} discussed is impractical, for
more reasons than one. It is not going to
happen, period. As a Telecom person, I can appreciate that status of the
industry is such that further investments are not possible. Not without
significant de-leveraging of balance-sheets, or Government solutions. {As we
speak, this is being debated}. And the
status of internet speeds & coverage is shoddy, to put it mildly. That puts
severe limitations on Technology solutions scalability on a national level, at
least for the immediate & foreseeable future. To make it practicable, you have to put forth a long-term vision for
this problem, detailing possible solutions. This has not been done.
Second is the
language problem. Most online & tech delivery platforms are in English.
This again puts severe limitations on scalability. We need to develop content
and platforms in Local Languages. This has its own problems in scaling up –
namely, this severely limits Target Groups size, meaning profitability and cash
flow problems, given current costing assumptions. Sure, the content is tops,
but it is in English, and frequently by Foreign instructors. Some are now being made in vernacular, to be fair and sure; it is a start. But a long way to go, with many practical concerns remaining.
That said, vernacular content is rapidly rising;
it is feasible the base assumptions may change, making this feasible as well as
practical in terms of preparing the content. The ELearning industry needs to move out of
English if it wants to penetrate. Third, and a smaller issue – unfamiliar interface.
Fouth, zero industry acceptance of online learning. Fifth, lack of common standards
that are common across platforms, ensuring certification, quality, comparability
and trust of the people who undergo learning on these platforms. Put all of it together- national scalability is not feasible, as
things stand.
The same is the
issue in the solutions entailing use of technology to solve, for example –
farming problems. This is already being done; and quite successfully. However,
the problem of scalability to a national level remains. {I am aware of one initiative taken up on a state level – so this is one
of the few practicable solutions discussed in the book}. Maybe, at some
future date, these things will happen;
but they wont come about without
attending to ground realities.
The main
problem in the section on farming is, it just does not go to the core of the
problem. It takes a very limited look at the problems of the farm sector, and
none of the ground realities, once again, get attention. Using digital, satellites,
technology is just great; appreciated. But this will not solve farmer problems unless the base
issues facing farming are sorted out. For ex, unbalanced fertilization,
excessive pesticide usage, lack of proper seeds usage by farmers, lack of price
realization at farm-gate- which is a function not of technology or price
discovery, but of Market and Price Access.
CONCLUSION
You wont cut
the Gordian Knot using the methods contained in this book; this a book that
looks at a higher-level view, and ignores ground realities. It is excellent
ideas – nearly all of them. But these are ideals, best-case scenarios; not the
solutions themselves. And they are not comprehensive. But it is a start that
people have started putting their minds into these issues. It contains many
sweeping assumptions, incorrect generalizations, unfounded defence of some bad
moves. All in all, a good first effort, by some of the best brains in our
country. But it stops short of being practicable.
Great review.
ReplyDeleteMy two cents:
Technology is a limiting factor for the only reason that it is lacking the vernacular scalability. A lot is this list to almost everything being in English, when it comes to technology and its utilisation .
I did somehow had the perception that the solutions offered would be utopian considering the background of the authors. I have not yet read the book - call me judgemental but I sometimes trust my instincts.
:)
First of all, Thanks for being a regular reader of my writing; please accept my apologies for not updating my comments-in-moderation. Very remiss of me!
DeleteThanks for the praise, by the way!
Agreed on technology as a limiting factor; I also feel that adoption, usage, access and pricing are attendant factors as well... what say?
On the authors, no comment. At times, on some things, Silence is best, as I am sure you will appreciate!
Vishal