This is the second conversation I am carrying on my
blog; the first one was with Mr Amitabh D Sinha, then the Director-Finance at
the SME Chamber of India. That one was around the topic of Development models
in Economics; which is a current and relevant topic. The topic for today is
another relevant and vital topic – Relationships in the professional sphere. The
continuing Economic Distress is throwing a series of areas under the microscope,
trying to figure out what went wrong, and how. But it occurred to me that this was obvious to quite a few of us, and
yet, this concern was not translated into action.
REASONS FOR THE ORGANISATIONAL COLLAPSE
This points to several areas of active intervention
for individuals, as well as organisations – especially the HR Fraternity. Chief
among these are Pure Knowledge, Trend Analysis, Predictive Analytical Capability,
Demand Forecasting, Function-Specific Skill Sets, Industry Trends &
Technology Developments, Decision Making Capabilities, Market Analyses. It is
the confluence of these factors that lead to or contributed to the economic
collapse. However, it also occurred to me
that in some cases where specific actionable intelligence and analyses were
present, this was ignored and the industry or company collapsed. Thus,
apart from all these, there has to be another factor in operation in our companies
that is as much a contributory factor to the collapse.
THE RELATIONSHIP ANGLE
Why were these signs and information ignored,
leading to organizational collapse? This points to a gap in two places : the
vertical as well as horizontal relationships in the said organization; and systemic
power structures which have become entrenched. {I am speaking from specific experience} – and at both systemic and
individual levels. The inability of both
companies as well as individual managers to communicate the urgency of the situation,
despite their being acutely aware of certain disaster in terms of widespread
product line failure can have no other reason, as in some cases there was an attempt
made to sensitise the Top Management.
This works at both levels, and in both directions.
A working professional Relationship requires a basic understanding of mutual
capabilities and respect for each other, as well as trust in each other. Now
this is not so simple an aspect of management; if your team does not trust about
you, or care about you – it can hinder information flow upwards – which is a
recipe for certain disaster, as many organisations have found out to their
chagrin. The employee has to care enough
about the larger context of his insights as well as be knowledgeable enough to
derive those insights.
In a fast moving marketplace, this can be vital.
The timely intelligence, analyses, if acted upon can lead to protection of
marketshare, productivity improvements, top and bottomline benefits. But for
them to take place, the organization needs to tap into all its resources; and
the people who are in the company must feel comfortable enough to air their understanding
openly. Most of the time they will be wrong; this is where experience of the
Top Management comes in – the ability to
judge the real insight from the multitude of insights that will inadvertently flow
into their systems. This will of course require robust systems, data
crunching, market knowledge and Trend awareness of a high caliber. But if
successfully bridged, the pot at the end of the rainbow is there for all : Top
and Bottomline benefits.
TAPPING INTO RELATIONSHIPS
In my attempt to go deeper into the Organisational
working, and the characteristics of high-calibre organisations, it thus becomes
clear that a fundamental requirement is employee comfort that enables him or her
to be open about these things, and that the team is receptive to these, at
times, outlandish ideas. It is clear that this cannot happen without the core
skills identified in the second paragraph; it is also clear that tapping this
resource base needs a robust relationship network within an organization.
Accordingly, I asked two people who are experts in building relationships what
the aspect of relationships in an Organisation is all about : Mr Milind Kher
and Mrs Riddhima Dua. The conversation is given below, in its entirety.
Mr Milind Kher is a person with over 30 years experience in Sales
and Management, with wide exposure to FMCG sales as well as Training and
Development; He is now into the wellness and relationship sphere in this mentor
phase of his long and illustrious career, and also runs a training organization
in the hospitality industry, a place which thrives on relationships. Mrs Riddhima Dua is a former MNC Bank
Manager, and now into the Training Industry and a certified NLP Trainer as well
as Coach.
THE CONVERSATION:
Q1 : How do you
define a relationship in a professional context? How is it actually perceived
on the ground? How do you think it should be?
A1 : In a professional context, a relationship is a
function of the relevance people have for each other, either in terms of a
reporting relationship, or then as colleagues. On the ground it is often perceived
as a necessary evil. Team AOR believes that it should be a fulfilling one that
evokes a positive reaction
Q2 : What are
the basic requirements, norms, ethics and ettiquettes in a professional
relationship?
A2 : Trust, Transparency and Teamwork are the 3 “T”
s of a sound professional relationship. These are the factors that need to
drive the relationship
Q3 : Is a
transactional relationship by necessity bad? Or can it be good under some
circumstances?
A3 : Where it is highly technical or process
driven, it is ok to have transactional relationships. Where trust and
motivation are involved, the relationship needs to move beyond that
Q4 : How can we
build a healthy transactional relationship in the professional sphere?
A4 : Delivering on time, in full is important in
ensuring a good professional relationship
Q5 : Is the
lack of fruitful relations in the professional context as bad an issue as I
perceive?
A5 : When the professional relationship is not
good, people do not give their best. Often, through passive aggression, they
may even sabotage the working of the organization. On the contrary, when the relationship
is good, people go the extra mile
Q6 : How does
the lack of such relationships impact the bottom line, top line and overall
competitiveness: is there is a link - and if so, how does it link, how does it
impact?
A6 : Look at companies like Zappos, Facebook,
Google. All of them offer a very good quality of life to their employees. And
the results speak for themselves. Definitely, good relationships help significantly
in making people go the extra mile.
Q7 : Is there a
link between healthy workplace relationhips and stress?
A7 : There is a very strong correlation. People
spend more waking hours at the workplace than at home. Stress at the workplace
is not only dysfunctional there, it spills over to home as well
Q8 : Can we
differentiate between vertical and horizontal relationships? What is your take
on both of these in terms of building healthy relationships?
A8 : Vertical relationships work on authority while
horizontal relationships work on power. That is why this is often called
lateral power as well
Q9 : How can we
build a link between healthy workplace relationships, job satisfaction and
Productivity?
A9 : It is important to document the actual output
after such inputs are provided. That will endorse the efficacy of the inputs
Q10 : What are
some practical guidelines, methods, processes that can be adopted to build
healthy relationships? Do they require organisational policy intervention and
changes? Or is it just a training & development issue, requiring
sensitsation? Do you think other areas need to be looked, like PMS,
Recruitment, Inter- and Intra Departmental control and communication etc
A10 : It is difficult during the course of a single
interview to describe in detail. Of course, during our “Alchemy of
Relationships” {AOR} workshop, we will be extensively discussing the impact of relationships
in the personal and professional sphere. Yes, Team AOR believes that workplace relationships are something that are way beyond
being just a T&D issue. Nevertheless, it is T&D that will have to drive
the whole process
As can be seen from the above small snippet,
relationships are a matter that is quite vital even in the professional
context. It needs to be understood what a healthy professional relationship is,
and how it is different from what we
normally perceive it to be. This will be covered in future articles on this mini-series;
for now, let me just conclude by saying or rather re-iterating that a healthy,
working relationship is vital; and even more vital is the need for
non-transactional relationships within an organization. Sad part is, this is
the least understood aspect of Management in organisations today.
Very good article, good, meaningful and thoughts .
ReplyDeleteThank you, Sumeet!
Delete