CASHLESS!!!!!
The newest mantra for the nation is this
simple, soft and quiet little word – Cashless, that carries within itself a
world of potent meaning, deep change, hopes, opportunities and stress…
everywhere you turn around, you can see people on social media avowing it as
the next great thing… while the naysayers are quick to point out a series of objections and
hindrances to this great new plan.
THE
NAY-SAYERS
My take – both are right, both sides are
spot-on; that said, there is a decided need to take a reality check for both
sides. The nay-sayers first : they need to accept that digital payments are
indeed getting to be the norm. You only have to visit the nearest multiplex window
to see how many seats get booked through mobiles and other online methods to
gauge the change that is sweeping the land. The
need of the hour is to avoid making this is a matter of political affiliation,
and view it as a sweeping change – one that is a logical extension to the
inroads of the Smartphone and the Internet, as I pointed out in an earlier
article nearly 18 months ago.
The current environment is strangely veering
towards political aspects – which have only a defined and limited role in matters
of economics. Be it social media or news articles, at least I have not come
across an apolitical analysis, which is of course admittedly hard to pull off,
given the important role political will and direction have in the realm of
economics. But this is a vitally needed exercise, so that the bare facts and
current status of the reality can be understood.
The advantages have been highlighted ad-nauseum
on social media as well as news articles; I would rather not go down that road.
In point of fact, the reality is that Digital modes of payment were always on
the upswing in India {Let us, for a
moment, forget the Urban-Rural argument. I will get to it in a minute}.
Fact also is that this has got a major upswing and increase in momentum due to
recent events. It is a further fact that internet usage as well as smartphone
penetration is increasing at a rapid clip – these are all facts, and virtually
beyond debate, almost.
The fact is that digital is here to stay; the
inroads it has made into various industries, and the disruptive power of this
new medium {subject of an upcoming analysis on my blog} – is bound to cause
upheavals, change, stress, losses as well as profits. That is the way with
disruptive technologies – they radically alter the playing field, making the new
approach, new strategy, new tactics and a new mindset a virtual necessity. All it requires is to add two words to the
naysayers argument : “for now”. All they state is mostly accurate – for now. This
is what we examine in the next part below
THE
CASHLESS ADVOCATES BRIGADE
The other side would do well to drop the
rhetoric and get connected with reality. The reason is straightforward – no amount
of rhetoric can overcome the very real problems, objections and hindrances that
lie along the path to increasing cashless mechanisms. A current exponential
growth rate of smartphones, data and internet does nothing to remove those
problems – neither does it guarantee cashlessness, nor does it mean continued
exponential growth. That is simple truth.
The first
and foremost thing that needs to be understood and accepted is that going
cashless is not and will never be a matter of economics or technology primarily. These are the enablers to this; the real
starting point is the simple reality of consumer acceptance. You may have the
greatest product on the planet – it is not going to sell unless the consumers
want to use it, period. This is one of the first lessons of marketing, to be
honest. You have to understand the consumer – not the mere presence of the tool
or the solution which you perceive can
make consumer life simpler
What makes the consumer life simpler is a
matter of individual choice and priorities, determined by good old values,
belief systems, demographic details etc – good old simple old-fashioned
marketing at its best. And from that
perspective, what screams out loud from the entire market is one reality – the penetration
of online wallets, mobile payments, internet payments has not kept pace with
the penetration of smartphones and the internet; and even the desktop & laptop.
It is increasing – yes; but it is a fraction.
What this tells us is that there are major
obstacles to large-scale consumer acceptance that have by-and-large nothing to
do with the technology concerned. Has anything changed to alter that? I cant
see anything. Let us for a moment assume that 100% India goes cashless in the
cash crunch. Given the base problems of consumer acceptance – the online transactions would then recede
the moment cash become available, given the customer does not accept it as a
feasible long-term solution. Now neither of the above will happen – 100%
India wont go cashless, and the ludicrous scenario of a reduction in cashless
transactions will also not come about.
CONCLUSION
A lot has been said of the physical issues –
lack of smartphone penetration in especially rural India; connectivity issues;
lack of POS terminals; Per capita income; hinterland issues et al; perhaps far
too much. My humble submission to all is that these are standard realities for
a developing economy, and only to be expected. What is more important is the
lack of acceptance and consumer education in the set of consumers who can be
called to be the innovators, the ones who drive the consumption
I am referring to educated people who still why
away from using the new technology. The reasons that emerge from understanding
these people is what will drive growth and consumption of cashless services in
India. These can be fear of loss, lack of a proper legal framework [whether
real or perceived} – these can be overcome. But that wont happen overnight, and
wont happen with rhetoric. It requires consumer research not just by the State, but also by the companies operating in that
sphere, who now need to identify consumer demographic groups consumption
patterns of digital payment and craft strategies to increase consumption. This is
something that will take time, so let us give it the time it needs. We don’t
need or want rhetoric in such a nascent industry…
Comments
Post a Comment