How does one create a Brand? Traditional Brand Management looks at concepts like the marketing mix, brand loyalty, awareness, personality, equity, positioning, attributes etc; all these and more are admittedly core concepts with a range of practical ramifications and uses. The difficulty I have as a marketer in relating to these is due to the excessive focus on one element in the mix : promotion, and specifically advertising.
No Marketer can deny advertising its rightful
place; it is through the medium of advertising that company products reach the
consumer, and make the consumer aware of the same; it also helps build loyalty,
creates differential & preferential demand, builds strong associations and
all the rest of it; that is pretty much beyond argument. But the problem is
that, in tandem with these steps, a host of other steps are needed to provide
the base from which promotion can build. Further, these other steps provide the
superstructure as well as stability.
Price and Product are most often considered
in this set of “other steps”; what is left out are the organisation policy
framework, culture, and... Place. The distribution network and its role gets
most often ignored. I shall deal with the first two at a later date; this
article builds on the previous article on Brand Creation, { Crafting A Great
Brand : The Channel Perspective : Crafting A Great Brand : The Channel Perspective
}
I
observed in the conclusion of the above article, “in my career so far, despite having covered in excess of 2000 retail
points at a minimum, I can’t really say what really makes products move from
the shelves. All I have experienced is that "Brand " is only one
among a set of factors, which I may pen in the due fullness of time and
experience... that is, to me - the final frontier of Sales and Marketing”
The question that jumps to my mind is simply this : Why is it that in over 16
years and more than 2000 retail visits, have
few customers come demanding a specific brand choice across Telecom,
Durables, FMCG in my observation?
Rather than compartmentalise this into the
regular constructs of marketing mentioned above, it seems to me that we should
look at this in an entirely different light : the relevance of the customer’s experience
with the company as a whole : Brand, Physical Product, Customer Touchpoints,
Communication, Usage Experience, Employee behaviour and Ethical Conduct, Process
Orientation as well as the Channel and its approach. The customer runs into
these aspects on a regular basis, and forms an opinion of the company and its
products basis a series of interactions; the sum total of these interactions is
what determines the customer response to the company offering, and a continued
relationship.
This is a divergent approach from traditional
marketing, which does not give as much weightage to these aspects, leading to dissonance
in the customer’s mindset towards the company. There do exist companies that
have bridged this, and built a solid rapport with its customers spanning
several industries – but they are few in number. Not all the points above will
be equally relevant for all products; for example, high-involvement products
typically will be impacted by most, whereas low-involvement products will be
influenced more by the Channel than the other aspects, although they will still
hold relevance.
When a customer enters a channel location, it
is the first face-to-face direct contact with the company; and what the channel
says in Verbal and Non-Verbal
communication / interaction to / with the customer is a significant influencing
factor; this is further strengthened by a comparison of the actual product or
offering vis-a-vis what the customer has been exposed to through Advertising
and Brand Building. When I enter a store to purchase a Shirt, or a Mobile Phone,
or even a bar of soap – I have a clear set of product attributes in mind – in
my observation, few customers have a Brand-Centric demand.
It is usually a case of having a
consideration set of Brands to choose from. Thus far, we are in established
Brand Management theory; what happens next is the key. The further ongoing
interactions of the customer with the organisation in the purchase process,
usage, and re-purchase is the single most-ignored aspect of Marketing in the
modern world in my experience. The first three Ps can only bring a customer to
the store, but beyond that, lies an entirely different and little-understood
world, both in theory {that I am aware of, at least} as well as in practice.
The impact of unfriendly channel policies, lax claim settlement etc are
all well understood by most experienced sales personnel; these have the power
to wash out sales from entire regions literally overnight. What is lesser
understood is what makes the channel recommend one product over another, given
equality in the basics mentioned above. If you have everything in place, it
does not necessarily mean that you have all bricks in place. Everything that
happens right from the first interaction to repeat purchase in an ongoing cycle
is the Brand’s core business.
The normal course of interaction in my
experience leaves this most vital phase of the purchase process with zero or
near-zero control or even influence of the organisation. At the most, as I have
observed by and large, the focus of attention becomes After Sales Service;
that, though vital, is only one aspect in a rather longish list. The modal
response usually hovers around the statement that the rest is not in the control
of the teams. But is that really the case? And more to the point, what are the
other aspects that influence the customer decision while in the channel
location? And, how does the Brand building aspect enter into it? This is the topic of the next part in this series...
Comments
Post a Comment