A
series of both known as well as common people have spoken up against
intolerance in the past few weeks and months – as also against this debate;
with each passing week, we get a new face on either side of this intolerance
debate. Each side, to be fair, has
cogently placed its point in front of the audience. This, to be frank – is not
worrying; it is in fact a great development that at least a debate, an open
discussion is being taken up in the Media and among the public; and in that
debate lies a sense of hope...
The
problem lies not in the cogently presented arguments; an argument, albeit
misinformed – can be countered with facts and logic only if it is presented in
a logical and controlled matter; but, if it is put forward in an insulting or
attacking manner, the scope for logical arguments getting through to either
side reduces to near zero, creating a vicious circle of point and
counter-point, an argument without a logical end or a defined direction in
sight. And that is what is happening in India as of now, in my humble opinion!
I
will not take sides directly in this article; the reason will become apparent in
this article itself. Some people have
said India is becoming intolerant, while others have risen in anger against
such statements. It is fine if you don’t agree; but the way you present your
arguments matter one hell of a lot. Ok, fine – so the intolerance brigade is
crazy, out of its mind, wrong and easily impressionable. But does that mean the
tolerance brigade respond with illogic and insults? Is that a sign of tolerance
– or are you proving your intolerance by hurling insults?
The
intolerance, in my opinion, is not in the Government – but in we the people,
and at a much deeper level than previously thought . Intolerance is in not
allowing that there might be a viewpoint that differs from yours; that others
have a right to an opinion that is at variance from yours. Intolerance is in
not granting the other side a respectful listening, and instead targeting it
with ridicule, insults and pointed taunts going right upto leave India. Intolerance
is in not in the hero-worship of an individual – everyone is entitled to a role
model/s. The intolerance is in not granting that there may be people who don’t
agree with you, and not granting them that leeway; rather, targeting them. That
is true intolerance
THE
GOVERNMENT & THE INTOLERANCE BRIGADE
A
lot has been said against this Government; but I cannot find a clear instance
where the Government has been directly
or indirectly intolerant. Fair is fair- let us criticise the Government by all
means; we are a democracy. But let us not go overboard. There is a difference,
a vast difference between the Government and some of its elements. In fact, the
very worst thing the intolerance brigade can do is call the Government
intolerant – that is serious stuff, and is not done.
That
said, the silence on several questionable and at times outrageous statements
and utterances by several leaders of the ruling party at the most inopportune
moment {Is there really an opportune moment for outrageous remarks? I wonder!}
is a cause of deep concern. I have no
doubt that at some point a message must have gone to the errant leaders to
reign in their views; but this is not in the public domain.
The
worst that this Government can be faulted for is its inexplicable silence,
which is getting more and more deafening with each passing moment. I wish the
Government, and specifically the PM, gets vocal, talks down the nonsense
emanating from the ruling party’s fringe, faces them down and calls their
statements publicly in strong terms. That would go a long way in redressing the
increasing disquiet in some corridors. It is this interminable silence that is
causing deep concern and worry. Eventually, I have no doubt that our PM will
speak up, given his handling over the years. I only hope he speaks up as soon
as possible – and in strong terms, which will quell the debate.
THE
TOLERANCE BRIGADE
This
is where things get interesting. The tolerance brigade, seemingly firm believers
in India’s justified reputation of religious as well as intellectual tolerance,
are up in arms at the seeming insult they feel at India being called
intolerant. That in itself is fine – an open debate and discussion is welcome,
as it can help clarify matters. The problem is the level of stridency in the
response from this tolerance brigade, which leaves zero scope for engagement
for mutual benefit and conflict reduction. If anything, the conflict of the
ideas escalated.
Ok,
so you don’t agree with the views of some of the people. Does that mean you
tell them, taunt them to leave India and go to Pakistan? Does that give you the
right to call them desh-drohi and a traitor? {Not talking of Aamir or SRK,
please! I don’t watch Hindi or English movies, only selected few make grade
that open my pocket! I am a fan of Marathi movies – and to me, Swapnil Joshi,
Mukta Barve, Vikram Gokhle, Subodh Bhave, Ajinkya Deo are bigger stars}
Does
that mean you insult the other side? Does that mean the Tolerance Brigade call
the other side a “Haraamzaadaa”? Does that mean the Tolerance Brigade make a
comment ”I will help you and drop you to Pakistan”? Does that mean they make
pointed jokes and taunts – not once, but consistently at the other side? Does
that mean the Tolerance Brigade call into question their patriotism? Have the
Tolerance Brigade considered that the Intolerance Brigade may be as patriotic a
side as the Tolerance Brigade? Does that mean the Tolerance Brigade makes it an
issue of national pride and national image?
This
is one of the most disingenuous arguments that can be made; the shrill response
from the Tolerance Brigade is actually equally harmful, as it does not
encourage dialogue. In fact, of the two sides, it is the Tolerance Brigade that
is more shrill, personal in their
attacks, insulting and deeply wounding in their response. This is equally
harmful to national image; a calm and considered response would have settled
the hash of the intolerance brigade once and for all.
National
image is the composite of all elements within a nation; sporadic statements don’t
hurt as much as a shrill and strident response does. Furthermore, the personal
level of the insults being hurled, the taunts and the baseless go to Pakistan
nonsense is actually proving the Intolerance Brigade right;
Google
defines intolerance as intolerance as : ɪnˈtɒl(ə)r(ə)ns,ɪnˈtɒl(ə)rəns/ noun unwillingness to accept
views, beliefs, or behaviour that differ from one's own.
This is the same definition that is found in Oxford as well. So, who is being
intolerant? Arent we proving the allegations right by our utterances, strident
statements and personal aspertions? Think about it.
CONCLUSION
There
isn’t any; not yet, anyway. But, given the personal attacks, insults and
strident, non-stop insults and taunts being hurled by the self-professed
professors of Tolerance, I am stepping out of this nonsense. I don’t see how
you can engage with a side that cannot be engaged with, and insists on deep
wounding barbs, citizenship taunts, insults.
Equally,
I cannot see how I can take sides with the other side, as it will only lead to further arguments.
What is happening isn’t a debate, it is a joke, and a sad, tragic and deeply
worrying joke – a joke caused by the stridency of one side. There are
flashpoints, but these need calm reflection, not insults. And the presence of these
flashpoints cannot be denied or wished away. Maturity demands an immediate
de-escalation, and a calm, controlled re-engagement at some later date.
Some
have stated their fears of rising intolerance. To echo the protestors, I too am feeling scared. Not of the Government, which is a good one. I am scared of the public and it's hyperbolic
euphoria, its deep taunts, complete refusal to engage in constructive dialogue.
That is why I have decided to stop penning on these matters. I will stick to book reviews, Foreign affairs, selected current affairs of
a non-political nature, but nothing on
Religion, and now these matters as
well.
Yes, I am scared.
Scared out of my wits by the public euphoria and clearly visible
intolerance to views not conforming to their own. The level of stridency is
scary; and beyond anything in my experience. So, I step out. The vicious and
targeted approach of the protectors of our Tolerance have won the day.
Good post!
ReplyDelete