We need reservations because of
the history of inequality and injustice that has preceded our current
generations, for at least the past 200 years, if not more. That requires some
rebalancing. Further, there are some areas in India where discrimination was
practiced; if some reports are to be believed, pockets still exist. Until our
society grows out of this scourge, we have little choice.
The question is : why
compromise on quality? Why cant we stress both reservation and quality,
impractical though it may sound?
Note :
::
The
earlier casteism was softer, and did not acquire its present shape then. It was
entrenched in a system of hereditary vocations, with relevant skills for each
vocation being passed from generation to generation. This built deep
intra-caste relationships and inter-caste dependencies, based not on oppression
but on a workable and eminently but brutally efficient methodology, that rivals
and beats any and every modern system with a modicum of ease.
::
This is
what ensured India's dominance for close on 9000 years - it built a system that
was extraordinarily hard for anyone to break into. The proof of this is the
presence of guilds that existed for centuries {Thapar, 2004/05 - will need to
check precise year of her book}. Another proof comes in the writings of Sujan
Rai from 1689 or 1696, who has described a flawless system of cash transfers
that puts our modern IT hot-shots and western / eastern management geniuses to
shame. {Habib, 2012}
* From
my Blog : Casteism - A Fresh And Objective Analysis
: Casteism - A Fresh And Objective Analysis
The above is another factor :
the hardlined and clearly demarcated lines of no-crossing {which developed
during colonial rule, but were based on increasing and steady hardening
immediately preceding colonialsim}. This created a deep division, entrenched
into stone. This also cultivated selective competencies in selective classes
{Prof.
Vaidyanathan in India, Uninc has brought to the fore the relevance of these
selective competencies even in modern Business in India
: India, Uninc}
Thus, my contention is in
support of reservation on demographic, historical, cultural, economic,
Skill-sets, and competencies parameters. In order to create an equal society,
we really do have no choice. That is what sets us apart as a nation : unlike
others, we are at least trying to say sorry, to set things right.
On annihilation of caste - that
is frankly, impossible. The term caste has a multitude of cultural
connotations, and is a reality of the social landscape in India, It is not
going anywhere anytime soon - and that is the truth.
The differences between cultural
practices in castes, {even sub-castes} is unassailable, and unbridgeable - and
range from practices related to religion, to even standard things like outlook
towards life, and other traits. This is due to centuries of inbreeding. I
myself can trace my family tree all the way to approximately the 1400s, in one
single unbroken line of authentic succession. In my own caste, there are but 57
family trees, with exceedingly well documented histories and practices.
The cultural and other
practical differences between castes are rock-solid, and hued into stone;
centuries of deep inbreeding within castes has set in stone the practices, so
much so that some traits are now almost genetic; and easily identifiable. Case
in point being my own caste : Kokanasth, which is a very small caste of
Chitpavan Brahman tree. You dont need to know the name to pick out one of us,
most times. Those who live around us can tell us a mile away; and most
Maharashtrians can tell even more easily! These have now been coded into Genetics,
almost - and is not going away; not for centuries.
Caste isnt going anywhere! More to the
point, it is the outlook of how we look to castes that needs to change.
Caste wont go away; the
differences in various castes ensure that this is a concept that will stand the
test of time in at least the next couple of centuries, The differences between
even related castes are huge; boys and girls, even today, are known to prefer
same-caste spouses by choice rather than parental force. The exception proves
the rule.
Technology and modernity arent
just equalising castes - they are also solidifying them. Case in point : I am a
member of my Family Tree Whatsapp Group, constituting far-flung members of the
extended Kale family tree. The same development that is breaking barriers is
also fuelling easy connectivity between constituents of the same caste. I know
several means of reaching my own caste members through technology. This is
fueling a deeper connectivity within castes, which might just solidify rather
than equalise. The same forces of change that are breaking barriers are also
acting on the other side of the coin.
The same technology, for
example, will enable a member of the Kale Family to check relationships with
another Kokanasth and check back to how many generations ago a Kale had
married,say, which Patwardhan and which Branch of which Patwardhan. Relations
are till the 5th Generation; marriage is feasible thereafter. There exists
documented and extensive family histories, well chronicled on the internet. I
myself have accessed it!
A corollary can be found in the
rapid rise of the vernacular film industry; far from Hindi becoming the lingua
franca, there is actually a reverse trend of rapid technology driven rise of
local languages everywhere across India. Remember : Technology and Development
operate equally on all sides of a socio-cultural equation. That is why I state
: Castes are here to stay.
Change
your outlook towards castes. I see no issues in a Kokanasth marrying a
Kokanasth; just as I see no issue in a Kokanasth marrying a Kshatriya or an
OBC, or any other caste. I see no difference between a Brahman and a Vaishya or
any other SC, ST or OBC. In fact, we should stop calling them SC, ST etc; the
constituents have their own culture in their own castes, like we Kokanasth. Can’t
we accept all castes as equals?
Change your outlook towards
caste, and how you view it. But Caste will not go away. We can undo the damage
to the caste system due to colonialism {Refer Maria Misra's monumental research
on this topic} - but you cannot take way caste. Modern forces ensure that.
The root is the caste issue;
that is the origin. Problem is we arent even trying to change our outlook
towards caste, and are, as a people, beating around the bush, swinging like
pendulum from one extreme to the other. At one extreme you have the dreams of
remove caste from society brigade, and at the other you have the vociferous
defenders of reservations and of the status quo. Given the ground realities, it
is impossible to remove reservations, and neither is this recommended.
What is required is a
sea-change in administrative delivery and capabilities, and a lot less chalta
hai, which is harming India no end. That is the only real solution - good
governance and deliverance of the results of governance to the people. That
will help percolate good ideas and people development; and that is precisely
what none among is even willing to contemplate. We need to remove the concept
of discrimination from our society, and that requires education.
Even
our sacred texts make the reality specific : I quote from The Shrimad Bhagwad
Geeta, Shri Bhagwaan Uvaach :
CHAATURVARNYAM
MAYAA SRUSHTUM GUNKARMVIBHAAGASHAH |
TASYA
KARTAARAMAPI MAAM VIDDHYAKARTAARAMAVYAYAM ||
The
Shrimad Bhagwad Geeta, Shlok 13, Adhyaay Chaturth,
This
shlok explicitly tells that the caste system was based on "Guna" and
"Karma"; these are Shri Bhagwaan Uvaach, the words of the Lord and
Creator himself. Why cant all of us understand and accept this as a cornerstone
of our thought process? That your status is a straight function of your own
individual abilities? That would allow us to focus on and create a system
wherein the intrinsic qualities of each individual come to the fore? Isnt this
doable?
How far have we come from this
shlok in our lives? The need of the hour is the education of the people, and
enlghtenment; which isnt happening. Caste as a cultural concept is now
irreplaceable, given the cultural practices and norms that are now almost
genetically coded. But we need to stop viewing caste as anything other than a
cultural realm and reality, and not as a status symbol, or as an achievement,
or indeed a means to an end.
Crafting this is not going to
be easy, and at this juncture sounds highly idealistic; that said, we as a
people do not have any other option. Rather than question reservations, we
would do well to look at the discrimination which does have a historical basis
to it; we would do well to look at the demographics; we would do well to look
at ground realities; we would do well to look at the full picture and modulate
our response accordingly.
The current system isn’t
perfect – that is beyond question. That the emphasis should be on quality is
pretty much a given; that we should move to ensuring quality intake is also
simple logic. But is this so simple to do? The question that we should, as a
people, be asking is : how can we ensure that the discriminated castes {I
dislike the terminology SC, ST, OBC} can get up to speed, and produce the same
level of results like the others? What is stopping them?
I appreciate and accept the
need for some sort of reservations, given the history of discrimination; but
shouldn’t we be trying to develop their long-term capabilities by investing in
proper education not at college level, but at Primary, Secondary school levels,
so as to ensure capability development? Shouldnt we be focusing on channelling
our energies at that question? Shouldnt we be asking what needs to be done that
everyone, regatrdless of caste status, can meet the same bar, rather than
lowering the bar, thus defining a new paradigm in the reservation system? Shouldn't we be examining if this is possible, as it would solve most problems, and trying to craft a course towards that ideal?
"Caste as a cultural concept is now irreplaceable, given the cultural practices and norms that are now almost genetically coded." --- I do not agree with the genetically coded thing as the endogamy in castes practice might have varied from region to region. There are Y-chromosome and mtDNA haplogroups genetic studies across castes/states available now. Some states/regions don't have segregations across castes i.e the Y-chromosome haplogroup (inherited from father) has uniform percentage across castes (for eg. R1a1 haplogroup or the so-called "Aryan haplogroup") while some regions feature different halpogroups among different castes (which signifies endogamy among castes). So,it's not uniform across subcontinent.
ReplyDelete"The differences between cultural practices in castes, {even sub-castes} is unassailable, and unbridgeable - and range from practices related to religion, to even standard things like outlook towards life, and other traits" --- Hi Vishal, I don't agree, while it may be true for the brahmins in the south and west , for most "jaatis" in the north ,there is no major difference in the culture. For example, after tracing last 5 generations of maternal and paternal side of mine, i found that they had different surnames and most likely came from different jatis than the one i belong today.This is quite interesting to me. I don't think it's quite unbrigable at all atleast for the current generation, i am seeing a lot of inter-caste marriages.
ReplyDelete" Caste as a cultural concept is now irreplaceable, given the cultural practices and norms that are now almost genetically coded." --- Again,may be true for some brahmins but definitely not for most castes i know of in the north and the east. There is no such gene for "cultural norms and practices" lol.
Jaati has to go away and inter-jaati marriages have to be promoted else some political parties will always keep promoting divisive politics.
Agree on Jati has to go; Disagree on no major difference.
DeleteIt depends on how you view culture; principally, there is no difference - you are right. But there is a lot of difference in world view, norms, practices etc - all of it is culture, or related to it. I too have an inter-caste marriage, so can appreciate your view. The differences are small, no doubt : but it is the small things that present the biggest problems imho
Thanks for connecting with my article. Regret the delay, I dont attend to comments more than once a month. I shall try and ensure promptness from now... thanks