Of late, it
has become a habit to first read... and then criticize the media for reporting
precisely what we have just read with a great deal of interest. Take the latest
example of what happened in Mumbai, or many such previous sensational cases. Many bloggers,
readers have made the point that the Media frequently resorts to
sensationalism, that it does not highlight and make attempts to reform. What
precisely is the role of the Media in a modern and free society? And why does
the media write what it does? The Media is simply the mirror reflection of the
society. It will only write what the people want to read... they are in the
business of selling news. That is one undeniable truth, and the sooner we
accept it the better.
It is our
patronage of the kind of reportage that occurs in the news, our penchant for
the sensational and the spicy that forces the Media to highlight what it does.
If we did not read it - they would not print or show it for the very simple
reason that sales will be adversely impacted. So, rather than scream at and
blame the Media, we should all look in the mirror and say " I am to
blame".
But what we
should be asking ourselves is what should the role of Media in our - or any
free - society be? The Media is a
powerful tool – it is something we Indians can be extremely proud of. But it
depends upon us – its image and its structure, its form and its content depends
upon us. We are the determinants of The Media.
We are looking at our own reflection… we are the viewers. We are the
ones who ensure that the Media and its components exist. The choice between the
role of Media – reporting + information V/s entertainment is made by us.
Reporting, Information and Entertainment are
all important, constituent roles of a functioning Media in a Modern Society.
But when people start to derive entertainment from someones’ misfortune… that
is a sign of depravity. For
entertainment, we have sports and movies etcetera. Misfortune is not fun. It should not be
regarded as such!
There are
any number of issues that can be taken up by the Media, like the status of
Primary Education, Inflation, Population Control, Crime Control, Armed Forces
Upgradation, Current Affairs, Energy
Security, China, Dumping... why is there a profound silence on these matters of
primary importance to India? There is no discernible national dialogue on these
matters.
Why should
there be a dialogue? How can there be a dialogue when the people are themselves
not interested in the matter, when there is little realisation how a national
dialogue on such matters can influence national policy and make the powers that
be sit up and take notice? A dialogue requires participants... the absence of a
national dialogue is mute testimony to the fact that there just aren't many
participants.
And that is
precisely why we should be worried as a nation. Rather than blame the Media for
the poor quality of reportage, let us start questioning oureselves....
The only
question that now remains regards the efficacy of such efforts. One such
example can be quoted from our Media- the almost incessant focus on Black
Money, which is just showing signs of bringing in some results. The moot
question is how did this happen - black money was always a serious issue. Why
has it taken centre-stage now? In my opinion, the people started getting more
vocal, bringing this issue centre-stage. The Media, to be fair, also helped in
this by continously highlighting cases of corruption.
From this we
can conclude that the Media, thus, has another important role in a free
society, over and above the 3 primary roles of Reportage, Information &
Analysis and Entertainment: leading change - social as well as economic - maybe
even political change. In that, our Media has been sightly slow and reactive rather
than proactive. (Even so, there have been notable exceptions which are
unfortunately very few and far between). However, recent developments have
altered the scenario a lot: there is increasing evidence of proactivism. For
this to continue, we need to keep leading issues centrestage in our minds and
be supportive in terms of our attention. This passive support from us will
suffice...
There is a
hindi proverb: taali do haaton se bajti hai, which is quite apt here. For this
to continue, we citizens too have to do our part. All that is required is
passive support in the form of our interest and awareness (awareness that
problems exists AND that they are serious enough to impact our families).
The author
is not pro-Media; nor pro-citizen. This
is just an objective statement based on personal observations. There has been
increasing evidence of some superb work by both the Media and the general
populace in recent years... let us keep this up and even extend this. From our
side, as I stated earlier- all that is needed is passive support and
awareness...
Comments
Post a Comment